半肾
精华
|
战斗力 鹅
|
回帖 0
注册时间 2007-12-28
|
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:为什么很多人都说mac os节能优化给力,但
引用第16楼teletha.testaro于2013-06-19 14:56发表的 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:为什么很多人都说mac os节能优化给力,但是看评测只觉得苹 .. :
@鸡蛋灌饼
能别尽说些虚的么,刚才拉出一个M系和U系比续航,发现不对转移话题了,
现在又开始顾左右而言他,我可没说他只会堆电池,但是也没看见他的神优化,
你能从这里面看出来么 说实的怕一下子把你抽死了http://online.wsj.com/article/SB ... 53392004347614.html
For the new 13-inch MacBook Air, Apple claims battery life of up to 12 hours. In my tests, the Air lasted an amazing 10 hours and 14 minutes, the longest any single-battery laptop I've reviewed has ever gone and about what an iPad gets. In more normal use, with power-saving turned on and the screen at 75% brightness, I estimate you could get well over 11 hours, nearing the company's 12-hour boast. That compares with the last MacBook Air test I performed, which yielded a result of 6 hours and 13 minutes, and which I estimated could meet Apple's claim at the time of 7 hours of battery life.
Sony claims 6½ hours of battery life out of the box for the 13-inch Vaio Pro and in my test it lasted 5 hours and 56 minutes. I estimate you could meet or even exceed Sony's claim in normal use. 10小时的测试结果是给Sony面子。想真的和MBA 13"比续航?对不起,再插个电池板吧。
什么你说13“的MBA是54Wh不好算,那两家的11"比下如何?都是30Wh的水平
http://www.cnet.com/laptops/appl ... 1_7-35781454-2.htmlBut lest we forget how good these are: the new diminutive Sony Vaio Pro 11 only lasted 5 hours and 56 in the same test. Sony sells a separate extended battery for $149 to double that up, but with the 11-inch Air, you're getting close to doubling that without any battery pack at all.
前面都说过了优化是个系统工程。Sony再牛掰能改Windows源码么?用些公版驱动都认不出的配件这种暗黑手段倒是一把把的。
引用第17楼newdasemo于2013-06-19 15:05发表的 Re:Re:Re:Re:为什么很多人都说mac os节能优化给力,但是看评测只觉得苹果堆 .. :
华硕之流那票z2670的坑爹货其他不行,续航杠杠的。  唔,把Atom给忘了
年底看看Bay Trail的SoC性能如何吧
要是出现Atom干翻低压i3甚至标压i3那就好玩了,肯定会有厂商用这货出暗黑笔记本的 |
|