四儿子（看网页）续航……比肾4强，不如肾4S

体制问题

Battery Life

We didn't have time to run through our entire battery life suite, but we do have some relevant results for the two devices. For smartphones, these are our latest web browsing battery life tests:

We regularly load web pages at a fixed interval until the battery dies (all displays are calibrated to 200 nits as always). The differences between this test and our previous one boil down to the amount of network activity and CPU load.

On the network side, we've done a lot more to prevent aggressive browser caching of our web pages. Some caching is important otherwise you end up with a baseband test, but it's clear what we had previously wasn't working. Brian made sure that despite the increased network load, the baseband still had the opportunity to enter its idle state during the course of the benchmark.

We also increased CPU workload along two vectors: we decreased pause time between web page loads and we shifted to full desktop web pages, some of which are very js heavy. The end result is a CPU usage profile that mimics constant, heavy usage beyond just web browsing. Everything you do on your smartphone ends up causing CPU usage peaks - opening applications, navigating around the OS and of course using apps themselves. Our 5th generation web browsing battery life test should map well to more types of smartphone usage, not just idle content consumption of data from web pages.

As always we test across multiple air interfaces (3G, 4G LTE, WiFi), but due to the increased network load we actually find that on a given process technology we see an increase in battery life on faster network connections. The why is quite simple to understand: the faster a page is able to fully render, the quicker all components can drive down to their idle power states.

All Android tests use Chrome and 5GHz WiFi unless otherwise listed.

The Nexus 4 doesn't break any records for 3G battery life, it ends up relatively low on our list - even the Galaxy S 3 manages to do better here on 3G.


WiFi battery life is similar to the Galaxy S 3, but again it's not all that impressive compared to some of the other devices in this list.






ANANDTECH转的



没测试完整续航时间


初步测试，只测试了3G/4G/LTE下网页浏览时间和WIFI下网页浏览时间
  正常使用还是能用一天吧，如果和传闻一样是2100mah的话

TCTF

其实apq8064这个电老虎做到这个续航就不错了

bears

水果电池确实给力，上周台风来了，macbook立马获得了巨型充电器这个成就
GS3开LTE和不开LTE的续航是两回事，不开2天，开了立马一天一充

qwased

ip5 用lte怎么比3g的续航还屌？这不科学

532

第一张图爱疯5 LTE 8.19小时，中间一个爱疯5   4.55小时

难道是LTE网络已经能远程供电给爱疯5了

532

引用第2楼bears于2012-11-07 07:54发表的  :
水果电池确实给力，上周台风来了，macbook立马获得了巨型充电器这个成就
GS3开LTE和不开LTE的续航是两回事，不开2天，开了立马一天一充

http://tech.163.com/digi/08/0310/06/46LF3SMR001628BV_6.html

随便搜了下几年前的本子就天生解锁这个成就了，不开机usb充电，巨大の充电器

Sheny

三儿子才1750好吧，看着四儿子的成绩也就是多400电池容量的功劳。

zxw11211

高通跪下吧

lollxxox

呵呵呵，One X续航比GS 3强，呵呵呵呵呵呵呵

532

厚电党再路过一下，续航x2

yu1

好惨

john

引用第4楼532于2012-11-07 08:41发表的  :
第一张图爱疯5 LTE 8.19小时，中间一个爱疯5   4.55小时

难道是LTE网络已经能远程供电给爱疯5了

某些机型的LTE发射器似乎比WCDMA省电，你看One X的LTE版和国际版也有不小的差别

引用第9楼lollxxox于2012-11-07 10:29发表的  :
呵呵呵，One X续航比GS 3强，呵呵呵呵呵呵呵

Verizon的LTE似乎是更费电，Verizon的Galaxy Nexus还特意加大电池
具体细节我不懂，谁来解释一下，应该都是FDD LTE才对啊

无名士

4S比4强？这不科学！

532

LTE这么棒？哪家的基带？

不过这续航差了接近一倍时间，如果剪掉屏幕跟CPU两个大头，LTE基带实际上自身耗电在不同模式下耗电差一个数量级？

真草稚京

既然是浏览网页之类的

先考虑的还是吃电大户屏幕吧.......

说起来

电信3G才真的吃电大户

晚上睡觉手机待机 开着3G不断的话

早上醒来只有20%接近的电量 8小时

四点

这绝对是你自己的问题了....我3g从没关过也没碰到这种事

ouoq

怎么会？就算开飞行模式也要掉个2%-3%

sakamoto

这图里面最惊悚的难道不是razr i么，那小到爆的电池

真草稚京

引用第17楼四点于2012-11-07 12:09发表的 回 16楼(真草稚京) 的帖子 :
这绝对是你自己的问题了....我3g从没关过也没碰到这种事

我没说我是4S啊.....

我是HTC  Thunderbolt

和ROM无关

估计这款本身问题吧......

四点

试试lbe看下是不是有东西搞鬼....我觉得单是开着3g网络不去用 不会发生这种事....

gil

我的one X也是，开3G待机一晚上也几乎不掉电，使用一频繁屏幕耗电就跑70%以上去了。3G浏览网页5小时，呵呵我这台开自动亮度三个小时电量就红了