婆罗门
精华
|
战斗力 鹅
|
回帖 0
注册时间 2006-8-19
|
我就觉得很有意思，楼主自己YY出这么多不存在暴雪黑，然后自己HIGH的很，还啥北欧神话，哈哈哈。
本来想点到为止的，算了，掰开了揉碎了问问楼主：
我就问楼主您老，D2发售的时候，您上过网么？您在哪看见的“d2 ...
前田利家 发表于 2010-2-22 19:19 
哪来的这么理直气壮呢
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/diablo2/review.html?page=2
On the other hand, the graphics in Diablo II are disappointing, especially when compared with those in the original game. When Diablo was released at the end of 1996, its SVGA graphics were amazing. More than three years later, those low-resolution graphics no longer look impressive and barely look adequate, and yet that\'s all Diablo II offers. There are some notable graphical improvements, such as the game\'s lighting and translucency effects and the new parallax scrolling that gives a 3D gloss to otherwise flat objects, but the game\'s 2D graphics are generally disappointing and look pixelated and lack sharpness on larger monitors.
http://pc.ign.com/articles/160/160629p1.html
Let\'s start with the most obvious part of the game and why all of you clamber for screenshots all the time: the graphics. For having been in development for around three years, Diablo II really isn\'t the prettiest thing to look at. It is so much like the first Diablo, and in fact uses the Diablo engine, that it almost seems as though it\'s a very fancy expansion pack. Okay, maybe that is a bit unfair. Some of the detail in the levels is very good, particularly the dungeons of Act II. But the characters and monsters really aren\'t the best I\'ve seen, actually look a bit dated at times, and don\'t look like the three years that went into them. The visuals are above average for sure, but not up to the excellence that we have come to expect. |
|
沪公网安备 31010702007642号 )
发表于 2010-2-22 18:03
我不喜欢RTS，我觉得画面很差，我可以喷吗