狂信者
精华
|
战斗力 鹅
|
回帖 0
注册时间 2019-1-14
|
终于找到森海塞尔近年来产品风评差的原因了，森海塞尔真把ie800那中频凹陷的两头翘曲线当宝了，甚至tws都是这么调音的，ie400,ie800s,ie500这三个产品更是一点诚意都没有，就是在ie800频响曲线基础上修修补补。
放一段音特美创始人的话，森海塞尔的调音会出现什么问题，自己琢磨吧。
出处 https://www.etymotic.com/about-us/interview-with-mead
Why don't other manufacturers make earphones with the same performance?
Part of the reason is probably cost. Most earphones are built with lowcost driver elements that don't permit an accurate frequency response.
Is that all?
No. I think the main reason is a lack of understanding of what a highfidelity earphone needs to do. There have been three major studies of the sound pressure developed at the eardrum by a sound field: Wiener and Ross (1946), Shaw (1976), and Killion and Monser (1978). All showed a nearly identical frequency response that included a 15 dB boost in pressure at 2.8 kHz coming from the combined resonance and horn action of the concha and ear canal. When you insert an earphone in the ear, it destroys this resonance, so an earphone with a "flat" response at the eardrum sounds very dull, which you can hear for yourself in some of the products at CES.
森海塞尔工程师这番话无损几十年前的研究结果，数典忘祖，什么ie800s凹陷一点更好听的话都说出来了 |
|
沪公网安备 31010702007642号 )
发表于 2019-11-30 22:21
