本帖最后由 giddenslee 于 2017-8-11 16:36 编辑
我觉得完全不是只读半篇文章的问题。
忍着恶臭把游研社的原文翻一翻。
“首先Jess Joho表示她的观点是有理论支持的，那就是弗洛伊德的潜意识论。那么Splatoon2是怎么通过潜意识给大家灌输性暗示的呢。” 原文对应的部分是什么呢？"To those with less perverse minds (or — ahem — those less well-versed in Freudian symbolism), you might not have picked up on the undercurrent of sexuality embedded in Splatoon. Hear me out." 我只能理解为小编不懂perverse的意思了。
下面那段列举，我姑且当小编不懂什么叫调侃，接受了。
然后下一句，“Jess同时强调，把什么东西射入洞中就产生出新生命，这毫无疑问是一种很强的性暗示。 这样说的话，我感觉我好像开始懂“弗洛伊德”了（滑稽）。” 原文对应的“强调”“无疑是很强的性暗示”的判断在哪呢？我反正是没找着。
"她指出：官方的人设本身就有很大问题。就拿Splatoon2里这两个主要角色来说，制作方就有用幼女和触手这样的元素吸引玩家的嫌疑。" 原文的相关部分呢？ “Firstly, it's important to note that the enjoyment of anime or hentai-style porn is not inherently wrong. Or, at the very least, not more wrong than what society's deemed to be the norm for porn: namely activities such as bukakke, simulated violent rape, and brutal bondage.
There's also a precedent for this kind of stuff in Japanese culture. In Japan, the age of consent is 14. Interestingly, Splatoon's designers made a point to establish this as the exact age of the Inklings. There's also the thriving popularity of manga, a type of comic book that is known to include porn that often features sexualized young-looking girls. But we're not here to discuss the morality of these practices. I did talk to a good portion of the r/Slutoon's community, and I'm happy to report that slutty Splatoon seems to attract a much more pure soul than those you'd find in the comments section of, say, a Pornhub video. ” 我估计是他大眼一扫，看见第二段有个splatoon有个young-looking girl，就想当然认为这段是批判官方了。
"但是她认为这些社区成员并不是因为喜欢鱿鱼长在头上那种俏皮的感觉，而是出于他们对鱿鱼和人杂交生物的好奇心。而这样的杂交生物一般只是出现在网络上的色情内容中。" 原文如此：“Because while responses from members of the community ranged greatly in terms of their reasons for being attracted to human-squid hybrid creatures, no one really agreed that the game itself gave off a naughty vibe. Most attributed their curiosity to the good old fashioned Rule #34: if it exists in the world, there will be porn of it on the internet." 下面我实在看不下去了，懒得一句句指他移花接木的内容。
就这种每一句都扭曲的德行，说轻了是英语小学水平需要回炉重造，说重了就是心怀鬼胎要搞事。这种稿子能发出来，游研社在我心中的地位直接归零。之前还觉得他们算是在低调做事，没犯过什么原则性错误，但既然想开始吃煽动情绪这碗饭，就趁早避开，落个清净。
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 上午微博私信喷了一波，他们道歉把文章删了，反思一下，我自己情绪激动也干了他们一样的事，动机揣测是大忌。最近搞这种事的人太多，有点神经过敏了。 不过我的主观点还是不变，媒体这么干，就是在拿自己的信誉往地板上怼，时间长了，再厚的资本也磨没了。
| 
楼主: 洛西LS
沪公网安备 31010702007642号 )
发表于 2017-8-10 19:04
