四儿子（看网页）续航……比肾4强，不如肾4S
Battery LifeWe didn't have time to run through our entire battery life suite, but we do have some relevant results for the two devices. For smartphones, these are our latest web browsing battery life tests:
We regularly load web pages at a fixed interval until the battery dies (all displays are calibrated to 200 nits as always). The differences between this test and our previous one boil down to the amount of network activity and CPU load.
On the network side, we've done a lot more to prevent aggressive browser caching of our web pages. Some caching is important otherwise you end up with a baseband test, but it's clear what we had previously wasn't working. Brian made sure that despite the increased network load, the baseband still had the opportunity to enter its idle state during the course of the benchmark.
We also increased CPU workload along two vectors: we decreased pause time between web page loads and we shifted to full desktop web pages, some of which are very js heavy. The end result is a CPU usage profile that mimics constant, heavy usage beyond just web browsing. Everything you do on your smartphone ends up causing CPU usage peaks - opening applications, navigating around the OS and of course using apps themselves. Our 5th generation web browsing battery life test should map well to more types of smartphone usage, not just idle content consumption of data from web pages.
As always we test across multiple air interfaces (3G, 4G LTE, WiFi), but due to the increased network load we actually find that on a given process technology we see an increase in battery life on faster network connections. The why is quite simple to understand: the faster a page is able to fully render, the quicker all components can drive down to their idle power states.
All Android tests use Chrome and 5GHz WiFi unless otherwise listed.
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6425/51300.png
The Nexus 4 doesn't break any records for 3G battery life, it ends up relatively low on our list - even the Galaxy S 3 manages to do better here on 3G.
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6425/51301.png
WiFi battery life is similar to the Galaxy S 3, but again it's not all that impressive compared to some of the other devices in this list.
ANANDTECH转的
没测试完整续航时间
初步测试，只测试了3G/4G/LTE下网页浏览时间和WIFI下网页浏览时间
正常使用还是能用一天吧，如果和传闻一样是2100mah的话 其实apq8064这个电老虎做到这个续航就不错了 水果电池确实给力，上周台风来了，macbook立马获得了巨型充电器这个成就
GS3开LTE和不开LTE的续航是两回事，不开2天，开了立马一天一充 ip5 用lte怎么比3g的续航还屌？这不科学 第一张图爱疯5 LTE 8.19小时，中间一个爱疯5 4.55小时
难道是LTE网络已经能远程供电给爱疯5了 引用第2楼bears于2012-11-07 07:54发表的:
水果电池确实给力，上周台风来了，macbook立马获得了巨型充电器这个成就
GS3开LTE和不开LTE的续航是两回事，不开2天，开了立马一天一充 images/back.gif
http://tech.163.com/digi/08/0310/06/46LF3SMR001628BV_6.html
随便搜了下几年前的本子就天生解锁这个成就了，不开机usb充电，巨大の充电器 三儿子才1750好吧，看着四儿子的成绩也就是多400电池容量的功劳。 高通跪下吧 呵呵呵，One X续航比GS 3强，呵呵呵呵呵呵呵 厚电党再路过一下，续航x2 好惨 引用第4楼532于2012-11-07 08:41发表的:
第一张图爱疯5 LTE 8.19小时，中间一个爱疯5 4.55小时
难道是LTE网络已经能远程供电给爱疯5了 images/back.gif
某些机型的LTE发射器似乎比WCDMA省电，你看One X的LTE版和国际版也有不小的差别
引用第9楼lollxxox于2012-11-07 10:29发表的:
呵呵呵，One X续航比GS 3强，呵呵呵呵呵呵呵 images/back.gif
Verizon的LTE似乎是更费电，Verizon的Galaxy Nexus还特意加大电池
具体细节我不懂，谁来解释一下，应该都是FDD LTE才对啊 4S比4强？这不科学！ LTE这么棒？哪家的基带？
不过这续航差了接近一倍时间，如果剪掉屏幕跟CPU两个大头，LTE基带实际上自身耗电在不同模式下耗电差一个数量级？ 既然是浏览网页之类的
先考虑的还是吃电大户屏幕吧.......
说起来
电信3G才真的吃电大户
晚上睡觉手机待机 开着3G不断的话
早上醒来只有20%接近的电量 8小时
回 16楼(真草稚京) 的帖子
这绝对是你自己的问题了....我3g从没关过也没碰到这种事回 18楼(Elisha) 的帖子
怎么会？就算开飞行模式也要掉个2%-3% 这图里面最惊悚的难道不是razr i么，那小到爆的电池Re:回 16楼(真草稚京) 的帖子
引用第17楼四点于2012-11-07 12:09发表的 回 16楼(真草稚京) 的帖子 :这绝对是你自己的问题了....我3g从没关过也没碰到这种事 images/back.gif
我没说我是4S啊.....
我是HTCThunderbolt
和ROM无关
估计这款本身问题吧......
回 22楼(真草稚京) 的帖子
试试lbe看下是不是有东西搞鬼....我觉得单是开着3g网络不去用 不会发生这种事.... 我的one X也是，开3G待机一晚上也几乎不掉电，使用一频繁屏幕耗电就跑70%以上去了。3G浏览网页5小时，呵呵我这台开自动亮度三个小时电量就红了
页:
[1]