[NeurIPS更正投稿政策，科协保持措施] AI顶会NeurIPS2026不再接收美制裁机构论文
本帖最后由 NeTlk 于 2026-3-31 15:42 编辑神经信息处理系统基金会（NeurIPS Foundation）与所有在美国法律管辖范围内运营的实体一样，依法必须遵守美国的制裁规定和贸易限制。根据相关法规，禁止向代表受制裁机构的个人提供各类 “服务”（包括同行评审、编辑及出版服务）。因此，我们无法接收或刊发来自这些机构的投稿。美国受制裁机构名单可通过以下链接查询：https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/
https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2026/MainTrackHandbook
# 更新
https://www.ccf.org.cn/Focus/2026-03-25/865918.shtml 误触了兄弟们
本帖最后由 NeTlk 于 2026-3-30 18:44 编辑
https://www.ccf.org.cn/Media_list/ccf/2026-03-30/869614.shtml 科协公告
笑死,这会议不光搞这个,
去年羞辱中国学者造假率超标的也是他.
纯纯抽象怪 好多中国大学糟重了…
清北华五还行…后面西哈是不是都不行了…
—— 来自 HONOR PTP-AN10, Android 16, 鹅球 v3.5.99-alpha 搜了一下我校，貌似不在，但是我校在实体清单上，matlab都用不了
—— 来自 OPPO PKJ110, Android 16, 鹅球 v3.5.99 顶会是作者给的，不是你自封的，忘了IEEE前几年滑轨的事情了？ 会议或者杂志牛逼是因为nb的投稿都往这投 而不是因为这个杂志本身牛逼
把现在占AI研究半壁江山的地方ban了那以后只能沦落为二流会议了 ccf可以把nips删了，这回有理由把ijcai搞回去了 这比当年IEEE加入华为包围圈还弱智
—— 来自 S1Fun 好死好死👏👏 这有什么意义吗...论文换个地方发表难道还会影响论文质量吗 放心，这种规定坚持不了多久的。 这种应该也给点制裁措施吧？
—— 来自 鹅球 v3.3.96 美爹，我太想进步了 不是这个领域的，想问一下这个顶会含金量怎样？是领域内唯一顶会的水平还是十几个顶会里的一个那种水平？ belatedeffort 发表于 2026-3-25 01:07
不是这个领域的，想问一下这个顶会含金量怎样？是领域内唯一顶会的水平还是十几个顶会里的一个那种水平？ ...
人工智能ccf–a会议，现在有7个 这种行为和当年禁止黄图的汤不热有什么区别？大家访问汤不热是因为你有黄图，没了黄图你屁也不是。 belatedeffort 发表于 2026-3-25 01:07
不是这个领域的，想问一下这个顶会含金量怎样？是领域内唯一顶会的水平还是十几个顶会里的一个那种水平？ ...
差不多水平的会议还有 ICLR、ICML、CVPR、ICCV
另外比较有争议但是被部分人认为水平差不多的有 AAAI、IJCAI
NIPs 其实是被 M. Jordan 跟他徒子徒孙把持的会议，所以才会有 ICLR 出来。我是觉得以中国现在在 AI 圈的影响力，仿照 ICLR 自己搞一个会议干掉 NIPs 也不是完全不可能
enix45 发表于 2026-3-25 09:13
差不多水平的会议还有 ICLR、ICML、CVPR、ICCV
另外比较有争议但是被部分人认为水平差不多的有 AAAI、IJC ...
赶紧把PRCV扶上位吗
—— 来自 nubia NX712J, Android 15, 鹅球 v3.5.99-alpha 本帖最后由 NeTlk 于 2026-3-25 18:59 编辑
中国计算机学会回应了
倡议中国科研人员拒绝向neurips投稿，审稿 这是等着对方滑跪呢，当年对IEEE是斩立决，事后滑跪了还得重新回滚
—— 来自 HUAWEI SGT-AL50, Android 12, 鹅球 v3.4.97-alpha 直接干死最好，有点给脸不要脸了，会议的水平是由投稿决定的，真当自己有什么通天本事了 太幽默了，搁这自刎归天呢 tiro_finale 发表于 2026-3-25 18:55
直接干死最好，有点给脸不要脸了，会议的水平是由投稿决定的，真当自己有什么通天本事了 ...
当年IEEE滑跪过，滑跪之后还干死就很容易引发反对了
—— 来自 HUAWEI SGT-AL50, Android 12, 鹅球 v3.4.97-alpha 其实nips一般认为是含金量比较高的ai顶会，理论性强，iclr icml之类的认可度相对低一点。cv领域另算。但这么一搞直接可以出局了
现在的大型国际学术会议少了中国人参会能覆盖成本吗 再直接一点，在这里发表的论文，在国内评职称评先评优或者竞争的时候一律不计入，或者倒扣。 本帖最后由 Uaral 于 2026-3-26 03:20 编辑
这事单从法律上来说也是NeurIPS傻逼，作为OFAC制裁权威终极来源的IEEPA有个Berman amendment, (50 U.S.C. section 1702(b))，IEEPA是不能管制和禁止信息沟通和交流的（单纯接收论文，以及就论文所进行的沟通，肯定在这个amendment范围内）。NeurIPS就等着吃屎吧。
下面贴个全文：
50 U.S. Code § 1702 - Presidential authorities
...
(b)Exceptions to grant of authority
The authority granted to the President by this section does not include the authority to regulate or prohibit, directly or indirectly—
(1)any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication, which does not involve a transfer of anything of value;
(2)donations, by persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, of articles, such as food, clothing, and medicine, intended to be used to relieve human suffering, except to the extent that the President determines that such donations (A) would seriously impair his ability to deal with any national emergency declared under section 1701 of this title, (B) are in response to coercion against the proposed recipient or donor, or (C) would endanger Armed Forces of the United States which are engaged in hostilities or are in a situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances; or
(3)the importation from any country, or the exportation to any country, whether commercial or otherwise, regardless of format or medium of transmission, of any information or informational materials, including but not limited to, publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds. The exports exempted from regulation or prohibition by this paragraph do not include those which are otherwise controlled for export under section 4604 of this title, or under section 4605 of this title to the extent that such controls promote the nonproliferation or antiterrorism policies of the United States, or with respect to which acts are prohibited by chapter 37 of title 18; or
(4)any transactions ordinarily incident to travel to or from any country, including importation of accompanied baggage for personal use, maintenance within any country including payment of living expenses and acquisition of goods or services for personal use, and arrangement or facilitation of such travel including nonscheduled air, sea, or land voyages.
...
------
查了下资料，OFAC早在2004年就关于IEEE审稿的事情出过公告，确认IEEPA下的Berman amendment保证学术期刊评审不受IEEPA管辖。
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/js1295
OFAC Ruling Confirms Peer Review, Style and Copy Editing Consistent with the Berman Amendment
April 5, 2004
(Archived Content)FROM THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRSjs-1295The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Friday issued a ruling to The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Incorporated (IEEE) confirming that OFAC does not regulate the important peer review process, as well as the process of style and copy editing, with respect to scholarly papers submitted by authors in a Sanctioned Country.In a letter to IEEE, OFAC Director Richard Newcomb states that IEEE can participate in peer review and style and copy editing for purposes of publishing articles from a Sanctioned Country without the need for authorization from OFAC.“Today’s ruling makes clear that scientific communities in sanctioned countries may publish their works in U.S. scholarly journals,” said Newcomb.“This process is vital to promoting the free flow of information within the global community of scholarship.”The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) are the principle statues that confer broad authority on the Executive Branch to implement economic sanctions and embargo programs.However, informational materials from countries subject to IEEPA (e.g: Iran, Libya and Sudan) and TWEA (e.g: Cuba) are exempt from regulation under the Berman Amendment. In September 2003, OFAC issued a ruling to the effect that IEEE’s use of peer review and style and copy editing may fall into the category of providing a ‘service’ for a Sanctioned Country, which is prohibited under IEEPA and TWEA if it resulted in substantive or artistic alteration or enhancement to the article by U.S. persons.OFAC requested additional information of these processes.After further consultations with IEEE, other members of the publishing community and the U.S. Department of State to develop a more complete understanding of those processes, OFAC clarified that IEEE’s use of peer review and style and copy editing is consistent with the Berman Amendment.A redacted version of OFAC’s letter to IEEE, which provides the substance of the ruling, will be available at: http://www.treasury.gov/offices/eotffc/ofac/actions/index.html.
-30-
赶老🀄走，白人剽窃谁的科研成果去？真以为念圣经能领悟宇宙真理啊，以后你们白人就天天念经得了🤣 美国的这些机构是真的忠诚啊。 小牛无大将 发表于 2026-3-25 19:08
其实nips一般认为是含金量比较高的ai顶会，理论性强，iclr icml之类的认可度相对低一点。cv领域另算。但这 ...
？？？要说理论性强，icml不比neurips强吗
iclr是历史比较短，今年刚进ccfa
icml是理论性最强，一大堆满篇数学推导的东西
neurips是范围广，cv，nlp，语音，搜广推，什么主题都能投 知网：我就说得整中国自己的学术评价体系吧 能中nips的工作真的会去投icml吗
论坛助手,iPhone 中国科协声明
neurips更新公告
NeTlk 发表于 2026-3-27 11:26
neurips更新公告
这文字超链接怎么还不对齐的
—— 来自 samsung SM-S9110, Android 16, 鹅球 v3.5.99 死扛到底 有骨气 那就以死证道吧
—— 来自 vivo V2464A, Android 16, 鹅球 v3.5.99-alpha 爆！
论坛助手,iPhone 敏感脆弱的美国人还能不能赢 原样反弹就行，不许当chair，不许参与审稿，事后还投稿的学生不给评优，教职人员不给帽子
页:
[1]
2